Skip to main content

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: dead-head_Monte Date: Nov 1, 2010 12:33pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Hey Islam_sucks!! Where are your facts!!

Californians, be sure to legalize marijuana. Schwag should be illegal.

I just posted the above Pointer, at the bottom of the page, in my other posting. That's what is linked, above... (technically, I've not read one word of the actual CA prop 19 language.)

visit my 3 reasons to get out & Vote thread

My unsolicited prediction:

Calif legalizes pot! Jerry Brown elected governator. Meg Whitman says, "Actually, I spent over $200 million of my e-Bay cash."

Voter apathy grips Progressives. Voter turnout is crushed by the HUGE $PRFITS$ made by Media Moguls, due to $billions of political ad-buys. Tea Party sweeps nation in a frenzied act of insanity tomorrow, Tues, Nov 2.

Weds, Nov 3, DOW soars over the 12,000 mark, or gains in excess of 1000 points, or both.

Giants Win! Giants Win! I hope it's tonight!

This post was modified by dead-head_Monte on 2010-11-01 19:33:44

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: rastamon Date: Nov 1, 2010 12:44pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Hey Islam_sucks!! Where are your facts!! NON GD

I think this election will be more corrupt than most..poll fraud and corrupt incumbants and the mas-corrupt unions thugs who don't want to lose power.

For gov? Imo, the demo & rhino both suck. Btw, what loophole did brown use to be able to run again? On a bigger level, could Bill Clinton run again? I'd vote for him over Os..Obama or Sarah (her being nominated would be a disaster for the GOP, much like McCain)
(so the mainstream lib press will push Sarah because they know she'll lose - pump up her ego, and knock her down, good folk never seem to get nominated, no $$.

Yes on 19? OK then. Peasout

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: DeadRed1971 Date: Nov 1, 2010 4:10pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Hey Islam_sucks!! Where are your facts!! NON GD

Jerry Brown's loophole:

(Wikipedia)
The fact that he has served two terms already does not affect him because Proposition 140 does not apply to those who had served as public officials before the law passed in 1990, as provided in Article 20, Section 7 of the California Constitution.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: dead-head_Monte Date: Nov 1, 2010 1:29pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Hey Islam_sucks!! Where are your facts!! NON GD

Rastamon, lmao!!!

one slight correction for you:

When you say, "so the mainstream lib press will push Sarah because they know she'll lose - pump up her ego."

Might I correct you, by putting 'that' more accurately, using THE REAL FACTS?

"so the mainstream lib press will push Sarah because they know she'll lose - 'pimp out' her ego."

Teddy says - "hey! I resemble that pimp!
CallMeTedcover.jpg

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: rastamon Date: Nov 2, 2010 11:19am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Hey Islam_sucks!! Where are your facts!! NON GD

Sarahsmile is a decent teabagger, but it would be too easy for the media to rake her over coals of Quail...hell, Joe Biden is as bad as Dan was, for a fun rake 'n bake.

I'm all for change!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Edsel Date: Nov 1, 2010 1:48pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Hey Islam_sucks!! Where are your facts!! NON GD

Real facts ?
yeah, right.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: dead-head_Monte Date: Nov 2, 2010 11:02am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Hey Islam_sucks!! Where are your facts!! NON GD

re: Real facts? -- well... At $4 Billion, Midterm Elections Poised to Become Most Expensive Non-Presidential Vote in US History

Bob Edgar, President and CEO of Common Cause, and former Pennsylvania congressman -- speaking on Amy Goodman's Democracy Now's news hour -- Oct 28, 2010

The midterm elections next week are poised to be the most expensive non-presidential contest on record. Total spending on this year’s election could reach as much as $4 billion, according to a new report by the Center for Responsive Politics. Conservative organizations are spending more than twice as much on advertisements and other communications as are liberal organizations, the report says.

As of Wednesday, House and Senate candidates had raised a combined $1.7 billion and spent $1.4 billion. Fundraising by parties and spending by outside groups brought the total dollar amount raised to $3.2 billion. While corporations are behind much of this money, the Center for Responsive Politics warns that many of the donating entities have nondescript names and don’t immediately, if ever, reveal who funds them.